<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The education 2.0 debate hits Techcrunch!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalbydefault.com/2008/08/21/the-education-20-debate-hits-techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2008/08/21/the-education-20-debate-hits-techcrunch/</link>
	<description>Matt Jukes: digital strategy &#38; open web in the public sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: masyomo</title>
		<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2008/08/21/the-education-20-debate-hits-techcrunch/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[masyomo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpass.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[good food for thought - thanks.

I can see with beanbag how theres scope for generating revenue. With School of Everything I don&#039;t get it at all - I love their philosophy - everyone has something to teach &amp; something to learn etc. but I don&#039;t get how the service itself can become sustainable (or why people would invest in it - but they&#039;ve done brilliantly on investment).

With the original chats about OnTheUp we talked about a model that would provide lots of data that could potentially be sold to funders &amp; commissioners. Stuff like what kinds of experiences are most valuable/beneficial to the end user - at this stage though I think it became too complicated to take forward.

What I think is really interesting is exploring potential new ways of supporting learning - and not just using the web to support existing models, but trying to use the web to provide opportunities that otherwise wouldn&#039;t be there. But the problem with this approach is it doesn&#039;t &#039;solve a problem&#039;, so theres nobody to sell it to!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good food for thought &#8211; thanks.</p>
<p>I can see with beanbag how theres scope for generating revenue. With School of Everything I don&#8217;t get it at all &#8211; I love their philosophy &#8211; everyone has something to teach &amp; something to learn etc. but I don&#8217;t get how the service itself can become sustainable (or why people would invest in it &#8211; but they&#8217;ve done brilliantly on investment).</p>
<p>With the original chats about OnTheUp we talked about a model that would provide lots of data that could potentially be sold to funders &amp; commissioners. Stuff like what kinds of experiences are most valuable/beneficial to the end user &#8211; at this stage though I think it became too complicated to take forward.</p>
<p>What I think is really interesting is exploring potential new ways of supporting learning &#8211; and not just using the web to support existing models, but trying to use the web to provide opportunities that otherwise wouldn&#8217;t be there. But the problem with this approach is it doesn&#8217;t &#8216;solve a problem&#8217;, so theres nobody to sell it to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

