<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CMS Catchup..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalbydefault.com/2010/02/16/cms-catchup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2010/02/16/cms-catchup/</link>
	<description>Matt Jukes: digital tactics &#38; open web in the public sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2010/02/16/cms-catchup/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpass.org/?p=534#comment-757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil

Yep I did see your post and have been keeping an eye on the Uservoice - done a little bit of voting as well.  I&#039;m not sure I have many ideas that aren&#039;t covered there at the moment - my big bugbear is usability on the publishing side of things - if it was easier for &#039;normal&#039; people to handle day-to-day editing and publishing I think that would free up enough time to solve alot of the other issues!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil</p>
<p>Yep I did see your post and have been keeping an eye on the Uservoice &#8211; done a little bit of voting as well.  I&#8217;m not sure I have many ideas that aren&#8217;t covered there at the moment &#8211; my big bugbear is usability on the publishing side of things &#8211; if it was easier for &#8216;normal&#8217; people to handle day-to-day editing and publishing I think that would free up enough time to solve alot of the other issues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Williams</title>
		<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2010/02/16/cms-catchup/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpass.org/?p=534#comment-754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you see my post on this subject over at http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2010/fantasy-cms-for-government/ ? I&#039;ve kicked off a list of ideas for how to make CMSs better - would love to get your input too if you have the time.

Glad you approve of the BIS topbar. That&#039;s my baby :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see my post on this subject over at <a href="http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2010/fantasy-cms-for-government/" rel="nofollow">http://neilojwilliams.net/missioncreep/2010/fantasy-cms-for-government/</a> ? I&#8217;ve kicked off a list of ideas for how to make CMSs better &#8211; would love to get your input too if you have the time.</p>
<p>Glad you approve of the BIS topbar. That&#8217;s my baby <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://digitalbydefault.com/2010/02/16/cms-catchup/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Dickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backpass.org/?p=534#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s far too early to declare our Science &amp; Society project a success, either as a site in itself or as a model for building a larger website from a collection of smaller blogs. But it&#039;s certainly an interesting idea, and we&#039;ll only learn about its true potential by trying it. Hopefully that&#039;ll then make it easier for others. ;)

Your core point is absolutely right though. And in my mind, it&#039;s further reinforcement for the open-source, lightweight and (dare I say it) WordPress way. If big expensive CMS solutions can&#039;t do what you want, and small cheap CMS solutions can&#039;t either, then the latter wins on cost and manageability. And if it&#039;s open source, then you have the right to build whatever add-on you feel is required. Bingo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s far too early to declare our Science &amp; Society project a success, either as a site in itself or as a model for building a larger website from a collection of smaller blogs. But it&#8217;s certainly an interesting idea, and we&#8217;ll only learn about its true potential by trying it. Hopefully that&#8217;ll then make it easier for others. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Your core point is absolutely right though. And in my mind, it&#8217;s further reinforcement for the open-source, lightweight and (dare I say it) WordPress way. If big expensive CMS solutions can&#8217;t do what you want, and small cheap CMS solutions can&#8217;t either, then the latter wins on cost and manageability. And if it&#8217;s open source, then you have the right to build whatever add-on you feel is required. Bingo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

